Skip to main content

Advancing democratisation in the Eastern Partnership countries: the role of CSO in national reforms and European integration

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

This EaP CSF policy paper highlights the main challenges faced by civil society in effectively participating in decision-making processes for national reforms aimed at democratisation in the Eastern Partnership countries.

In the Eastern Partnership, civil society remains a trusted partner and agent of change, promoting European values and sustainable democratic reform.  

Civil society continues to play a key role in pushing for democratic reforms, ensuring accountability, and sustaining public engagement in European integration. However, shrinking civic spaces, growing state repression against civic activists, media and civil society, and the absence of structured participation mechanisms undermine its effectiveness. The halt of the US funding is further impacting civil society’s capacity to operate and remain relevant.    

The paper analyses the state of play and best practices that could be employed to strengthen the role of civil society in promoting democratic transformation and rule of law reforms across all EaP countries.       

We invite you to read the policy paper below.

Please note, the policy paper was launched during a public event on Wednesday 14 May 2025. A summary of the discussion can be found here.

EaP CSF Policy Paper WG1Download

Enhancing social dialogue for social justice and decent work policies across the EaP

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

How can social dialogue be enhanced to implement social justice and decent work policies across the Eastern Partnership countries? 

The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum is pleased to introduce its Working Group 5 policy paper. The paper examines how social partners and civil society can play a more active and meaningful role in strengthening social dialogue across Eastern Partnership countries.  

The paper specifically explores the mechanisms through which civil society organisations can contribute to the formulation and implementation of social justice and decent work policies. It focuses on identifying concrete actions that can be taken to enhance participation of social partners and civil society in social dialogue processes, while considering the unique political, economic, and social contexts of different EaP countries. 

Launch event

This policy paper was launched during a hybrid roundtable on Tuesday 6 May. A summary of the discussion can be read here.

Additional resources

You can read and download the policy paper below:

EaP CSF Policy WG5 FinalDownload

EaP CSF contributions to the European Commission Enlargement Package 2025 

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

EaP CSF contributions to the European Commission Enlargement Package 2025 

The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum conducted a consultation on enlargement with civil society organisations from the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, and Georgia, which are EaP countries with an EU candidate status.  The European Commission will adopt its annual Enlargement Package 2025 later in the year, providing a detailed assessment of the state of play and progress made by these countries on their respective paths towards EU accession.  

In June 2024, the EU officially opened accession negotiation with the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine. The first cluster of the EU acquis to be opened will be the ‘fundamental’ cluster, which includes the foundations of the rule of law and democracy and focuses on reforms that will determine the overall pace of negotiations.   

In view of the European Commission Enlargement Package 2025, the EaP CSF consultation focused on issues pertaining to Chapter 23: Judiciary and fundamental rights and Chapter 24: Justice, freedom and security of the EU acquis, which will be the first two chapters to be opened within the fundamentals cluster.  

Here are some key country highlights and recommendations that we issued to the European Commission: 

Georgia  

  • Independent Judiciary and Media: There is a pressing need for reforms to ensure the independence and transparency of the judiciary, protect media freedom, and safeguard the rights of journalists. This includes preventing political interference in judicial processes, ensuring timely and accessible court decisions. 
  • Protection of Civil Liberties: Immediate action is needed to halt the crackdown on civil society, including the repeal of restrictive laws like the “foreign agents” law, and to protect the rights to freedom of assembly, speech, and protest. Strengthening the legal framework to prevent the misuse of state power and ensuring the fair treatment of activists and journalists, free and fair elections are critical steps toward restoring public trust in democratic institutions. 

Moldova 

  • Functioning of the judiciary: The vetting of the members of the Supreme Court of Justice is progressing; the main challenge is the selection of non-judge members. Despite the regular information sessions with law professionals, academia and civil society specialists conducted by the Ministry of Justice and Superior Council of Magistracy to compete for the positions of non-judge members, few candidates applied. The vetting of the courts of appeal is ongoing. The main issue is the lack of human resources at the Court of Appeal of Chișinău and other courts, such as Comrat and Cahul, while temporary measures adopted by the Superior Council of Magistracy to delegate temporary judges from other courts to the courts of appeal are not ideal in the mid-to-long term. Moreover, the vetting of prosecutors should be sped up as no major progress has been made. 
  • Fight against corruption and organised crime: The announced reform to create a new specialised anti-corruption and fight against organised crime prosecutor’s office by dissolving the Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime and Special Cases (PCCOCS) and the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (APO) risks jeopardising current and future investigation of high-level corruption and criminal organised crimes. An ex-ante thorough assessment of feasibility, clear roadmap for implementation and transition period should be conducted. Effectively implementation of the reform ahead of autumn’s parliamentary elections, when cases of vote-buying schemes will intensify, looks unrealistic. The APO is still in the process of being reformed; the Office still lacks human, technical and financial resources and requires a higher number of prosecutors, investigation officers, equipment and specialists. A temporary measure is to create a special unit within the General Prosecutor’s Office tasked with monitoring cases of high-level corruption, and joint investigation teams of prosecutors to work on high-level political corruption cases.  
  • Fundamental rights: At present, no legislation or responsible body handling cases of breaches of human rights in the Transnistrian region is in place. Civil society calls on the Moldovan authorities to set up a responsible body tasked with implementing normative acts and inform the people from the Transnistrian region about the procedures to follow on such cases. 

Ukraine

  • Independent Judiciary: civil society calls for the continued implementation of justice reforms and the judiciary, and for the inclusion of civil society and international experts in decision-making processes. Ukraine’s Judicial Reform Roadmap should outline all the key reforms that Ukraine must implement to receive green light for EU accession. Judicial selection should involve international experts – this mechanism should be preserved until Ukraine’s judicial system meets European standards. This would safeguard the impartiality and credibility of the system. These reforms are essential for fostering a judiciary that is both independent and resistant to corruption, thereby for strengthening public trust in the rule of law. 
  • Independent Media: Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine has severely impacted independent media. Journalists face physical danger and continue to struggle with the economic consequences of the war. Russian interference, propaganda, and cyberattacks pose significant challenges. The situation has been further exacerbated by the USAID funding freeze, which threatens media independence and could lead to increased control by oligarchs and foreign propaganda. Civil society calls to prioritise journalists’ physical and digital safety and to develop independent and transparent financial support systems for independent media to counter disinformation. 

New EaP CSF interim Director

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

Martin will lead the work of the EaP CSF Secretariat during current Director Tania Marocchi’s upcoming maternity leave.

A native from the Czech Republic, Martin brings more than 20 years of experience in non-profit management having previously worked for Caritas and the Danish Refugee Council. He is also familiar with the Eastern Partnership region having recently led Oxfam’s regional Response Programme in Ukraine.

“Martin brings a wealth of experience that can greatly support the advancement of EaP CSF’s mission and activities. During my absence, he will continue supporting the contribution of EaP civil society organisations in  political debates and policy reforms. The beginning of 2025 shows us, if ever there was a need, that the voice of civil society is even more essential to bolster our democratic values. I am confident Martin’s wealth of experience and regional knowledge will help the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum in supporting the democratic and European aspirations of our friends in the Eastern Partnership” declared Tania Marocchi, Director of the EaP CSF Secretariat.

“I am delighted to take on this role as interim director of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. Recent political developments have shown both the great upheaval of the international world order of the last 70 years but also the strong aspirations for democracy and freedom of citizens and civil society organisations across the Eastern Partnership. I look forward to working with our partners towards the European future of our Eastern Partnership neighbours” said Martin Vane, interim Director of the EaP CSF Secretariat.

Towards a new, European chapter in Armenia’s history

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

We, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (EaP CSF) and its Armenian National Platform welcome the adoption by the Armenian National Assembly of the law launching the Republic of Armenia’s accession process to the European Union. This marks a pivotal and historic moment that confirms Armenia’s strategic orientation and places European integration at the core of its state-building agenda.

As stated in the newly adopted law:

“The Republic of Armenia, aiming to develop democratic institutions, improve the well-being of society, strengthen the country’s security, resilience, and the rule of law, declares the launch of the process of the Republic of Armenia’s accession to the European Union.”

This declaration is far more than symbolic. It carries profound political, legal, and societal significance. It lays the foundation for a new chapter in Armenia’s modern history, anchored in the principles of democracy, human rights, good governance, and the rule of law. At a time of mounting geopolitical challenges, this step brings clarity to Armenia’s foreign policy direction and opens the path toward a lasting peace, development, and security within a European framework.

Armenian civil society has been a steadfast advocate for European integration. Over the past decade, the Armenian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum has consistently supported reforms aligned with EU standards, promoted participatory democracy, and contributed to the strengthening of public institutions. A clear reflection of this commitment is the fact that the draft law titled “On the Launch of the Process of the Republic of Armenia’s Accession to the European Union” was submitted to the National Assembly through the efforts of the “Eurovote” civic initiative, whose founding members are primarily representatives of organisations within the EaP CSF Armenian National Platform.

Commending its efforts to bring Armenia closer to EU, we call on the Government of Armenia to:

  • Develop and publish a comprehensive national strategy for EU accession, based on a transparent and inclusive consultation process involving civil society and other stakeholders,
  • Establish a detailed roadmap with clear timelines, reform priorities, and measurable benchmarks aligned with the Copenhagen criteria,
  • Resolve institutional and legal inconsistencies that could hinder the start of the EU integration process, most notably by formally expressing Armenia’s intention to withdraw from the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Despite the existing agreements with the EAEU, significant steps have been taken to reduce Armenia’s dependencies on Russia and to strengthen Armenia’s security resilience,
  • Establish a dedicated Minister position tasked with leading and coordinating the EU accession agenda, oversee inter-agency efforts, and drive the implementation of European reforms. This proposal has already been supported by civil society, MPs and non-parliamentary democratic political forces.

We also urge the Armenian Government to initiate formal dialogue with the European Union on signing a new, updated agreement that reflects the logic and spirit of the newly adopted law, including provisions for the establishment of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). These steps are essential to unlocking the full benefits of European integration: access to EU markets, increased investment, innovation, and institutional reform mechanisms that support long-term stability and prosperity.

At the same time, we call on the EU and its Member States to:

  • Intensify political dialogue with the Armenian Government to strengthen Armenia’s resilience. Armenia’s closer integration with the EU strengthens its resilience amid foreign and regional threats. Physical and hybrid threats in the form of foreign information manipulation, interference and cyber-attacks continue to undermine the security architecture of the country and will intensify in view of 2026 parliamentary elections. The continued presence of the EU’s civilian monitoring mission along the Armenia-Azerbaijan border is vital and must be maintained until a lasting peace agreement is signed by both sides and durable confidence-building measures are in place. Armenian civil society continues to play a vital role in strengthening Armenia’s socio-economic resilience and enhancing human security in the country.
  • Facilitate further EU integration in light of Armenia’s explicitly articulated European aspirations, bolster its relations with Armenia and support the Armenian Government and the people of Armenia in the country’s democratic path towards a fully-fledged ‘3+1’ approach that includes the Trio Associated countries and Armenia,
  • Provide staunch political support to peace efforts and facilitate the unblocking of transport links with Azerbaijan.

Civil society must be recognised as a strategic partner in both Armenia’ decision-making and Armenia’s bilateral relations with the EU. Public engagement, civic monitoring, inclusive and meaningful participation in policymaking are vital to ensure that the EU integration process is not only successful but also reflects the will of the Armenian people.

Armenia’s decision to launch the EU accession process is a bold and forward-looking choice. One that will reshape Armenia’s role in the region. It sends a clear message to the Armenian citizens, EU and international partners: Armenia’s future lies in a democratic, secure, and rule of law-based Europe.

The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum and its Armenian National Platform stand ready to accompany and support this historic journey – through expertise, dialogue, and active engagement – so that European integration becomes not just a foreign policy goal, but a lived and inclusive reality for all in Armenia.

The Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum and the Armenian National Platform

Additional resources

Read or download the statement in PDF below.

Statement – Towards a new, European chapter in Armenia’s historyDownload

Eastern Partnership Senior Officials Meeting Speech by Gurgen Petrosyan

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

Dear representatives of European Institutions and Member States, 

Dear Eastern Partners, 

Dear colleagues, 

I am pleased to speak to you today on behalf of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. It is an honour to share civil society’s perspective on how to advance bilateral and regional cooperation under the Eastern Partnership policy. 

Since its launch in 2009, the Eastern Partnership initiative has taken up the role of a safeguard, anchoring the EaP countries and their societies to the European Union and its values. After 16 years, the EaP remains a valuable tool to promote democratic reforms in all the EaP countries.  

We started 2025 with a renewed commitment, by the Polish Presidency, to update and reinvigorate the Eastern Partnership. Complementarity with the enlargement process, pro-European reforms and security are main priorities. Today, civil society asks to capitalise on this commitment, and work towards a renewed policy. 

Continuing investing in effective rule of law, democratic institutions and security-encompassing human, economic and energy concerns-is the only way not only to maintain the investments of the past but also, and most importantly, to secure long- term, sustainable and irreversible change. Civil society plays a key role in strengthening the ability of the EaP to boost security resilience and strengthen national authorities through rule of law reforms. It should be more actively involved in the decision-making, both multilaterally between the EU and the EaP region, and bilaterally between the EU and the EaP countries.  

Since the last Senior Officials Meeting, one year ago, the EU officially opened accession negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine. This success was largely promoted by the EaP policy, setting the ground for the momentous progress towards EU accession. The official opening of accession negotiations provided impetus to both countries’ internal reform agenda. Trusting and support civil society’s expertise and involvement in the policymaking and pre-accession process through regular consultations, remains vital. 

Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine just entered its fourth year. In the context of the ongoing geopolitical complexity, Ukraine’s integration into the EU constitutes a long-term security guarantee for the country and should remain central in the Union’s political agenda.  

In Georgia, despite its candidate status, civil society and independent media are not able to continue operating freely in a context where the government is employing new forms of pressure by weaponised legislation. As you know, many civil society organisations have relocated and reoriented their work abroad, especially in Armenia. While the risk to end up in a Russia-like scenario is extremely high, we call on Georgian authorities to end the systematic crackdown on civil society and independent media, swiftly realign with EU values and norms and recommit to Georgia’s EU path. 

The situation in Georgia has an impact on the South Caucasus region, in particular Armenia, where civil society continues be a trusted partner and agent of change, promoting sustainable democratic reforms and articulating European aspirations. We call on the EU and EaP to pave the way to the implementation of the Crossroads of Peace project and strengthen connectivity in the region. 

We remain concerned about the situation in Azerbaijan, where a new wave of arrests, repression and detention of civil society representatives and human rights activists intensified over the past few months. The current situation in Georgia has also serious consequences on the several Azerbaijani civil society organisations operating via their Georgian intermediaries. This is having an impact on their daily operations and interconnection with their counterparts at regional level. 

Last point is on Belarus. Although not represented in this room, we will continue to channel the voice of Belarusian civil society. The EaP policy, and the Civil Society Forum, maintains it connected regionally with their democratically minded peers.  

Political repressions, persecution of civil activists, independent media, and opposition figures wages on in the country. January’s sham elections were an important occasion for the international community and media to continue to shed light about the over 1,300 political prisoners detained in the country.  

We call on the EU and its Member States to continue providing staunch political support to Belarusian democratic forces and civil society. Priority should be provided to the mobilisation of resources to support civil society operating inside the country, including through maintaining connections, providing education and offering financial assistance to activists and organisations within the country. 

* * * 

Speaking about the workplan, we are happy to see that, as of this year, the work plan will be multi-annual, covering a three-year period to better align with the Multiannual Financial Framework. This is a clear sign of commitment to continue the EaP policy. 

We believe that a robust mid-term review should be included to adjust the activities to the needs on the ground on the basis of EaP political and legislative developments. Senior Official Meetings will be the place where to address these recommendations, starting with the SOM taking place in October this year. 

On the objective, we welcome the creation of synergies with the Black Sea region. Such as on economic security, energy security, transportation, and data connectivity. Mindful of the importance to not overlap the EaP policy with the upcoming Black Sea strategy, we consider that a strategic and a more active engagement with civil society from the Black Sea region can contribute to strengthen the resilience of EaP societies.  

One last general point. We reiterate the importance of ownership and leadership from the EU Member States and are happy to see a good level of interaction with some of them on the work plan activities. We welcome the leading role of Polish and Lithuanian colleagues in the work plan and encourage others Member States, starting from Denmark, who takes over the next EU Council Presidency. A more involvement of those Member States that are not traditional sponsors of the Eastern Partnership region should be explored to ensure a more shared support for the continuation of the policy. 

On the EaP side, more EaP countries should be in the lead in key work plan activities and a higher level of engagement could be potentially discussed.  

On the priority areas, we would like to underline the following points: 

  • A strong focus on complementarity with the enlargement process results evident from the work plan. In continuation with the 2024 experience, the rule of law seminar is an important platform to assess implementation of rule of law reforms.  

While this is relevant to Moldova and Ukraine, the promotion of the so-called ‘fundamentals’ should be reflected into the work plan in relation to all the EaP countries, regardless of their level of engagement with the EU. 

  • Moving on towards 2027, we are happy to see a strong commitment to support independent media and strengthen media literacy. This comes in a context where electoral campaigns ahead of last October’s elections in Moldova and Georgia were marked by active disinformation campaigns. Civil society plays an active role on media literacy, empowering citizens to assess the information they encounter online, identify sources they can trust, and make well-informed decisions. Supporting programmes on media literacy for civil society and independent media will be important in view of Moldova’s parliamentary elections. 
  • Continuing the successful experience of last years, we found the working group for gender equality a valuable platform for sharing best practices and recommendations on gender-based violence, pay gap and women’s access to justice. We are happy to continue representing Belarusian civil society in the working group. 
  • In a context where hybrid threats are on the rise, we welcome that an EaP Seminar on Security and CSDP will continue to take place. The EaP fosters stability and security in the region and promotes Common Foreign and Security Policy alignment. Strengthening the intersection between the CSDP and the EaP policy can ensure more cooperation in the framework of the CSDP, mainly on operational capability.   
  • Taking stock from the 2024 work plan, we recommend mainstreaming a human security approach in the work plan, including through the reintroduction of trainings. A human security approach can directly contribute to democratisation, transparency, and accountability in policymaking, facilitating a transition towards governance models that prioritise the involvement of all citizens. 

We continue to advocate for the creation of a dedicated Working Group on Civic Space on questions on civil society’s participation in decision making, regulatory environment and legal frameworks, and access to funding, for a thriving civic space.  

Access to funding became an urgent need for civil society following the recent USAID funding freeze. The Forum recently conducted a survey with over 120 organisations working on human rights, media, youth, and think tanks. The survey highlighted that the USAID funding freeze has had a detrimental impact on their activities, including immediate disruptions in project implementation, suspension of capacity-building programs and community engagement initiatives. Many CSOs are struggling to retain key team members or proceeding with important layoffs. In this context of financial uncertainty, it is nearly impossible to plan or implement critical activities. In this regard, a Working Group on Civic Space could explore discussions on core funding and operational grants for EaP CSOs operating in the EaP countries and in exile. This will improve their abilities to build capacity and contribute to the design, implementation and assessment of EaP national laws, raising the bar on civic engagement and support democratic reform at the same time. 

Lastly, we have a practical recommendation to improve accountability of meetings. As advocated during last year’s SOM, we welcome the practise of sharing the main conclusions and recommendations of the discussion, sending informal reports to participants after the meetings. We encourage to strengthen this practice, making it standard, and to invite participants to provide comments after the meetings.  

I will stop here. Thank you very much for your attention. I wish you a productive continuation of the meeting and look forward to continuing to engage with you to support our shared values.

Open letter on improvements to the Ukraine Facility Regulation

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

On 28 February, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum co-signed an open letter proposing improvement to the Ukraine Facility Regulation.

The letter was addressed to Commissioner for Enlargement, Ms Marta Kos; Director-General for Enlargement and the Eastern Neighbourhood, Mr Gert Jan Koopman and Eu AMbassador and Head of the EU Delegation to Ukraine, H.E. Katarína Mathernová.

The text of this letter is available below and a PDF copy, with annex and full list of signatories, at the bottom of this page.

Dear Commissioner Kos, Director-General Koopman, and Ambassador Mathernová,

We, the undersigned Ukrainian and European civil society organisations, appeal to you concerning the implementation of the Ukraine Facility Regulation as it reaches its one-year mark.

In light of recent geopolitical developments, the Ukraine Facility now more than ever constitutes a vital support mechanism for Ukraine, providing EUR 50 billion over the 2024-2027 period. This funding is helping Ukraine in its efforts to maintain macro-financial stability, promote recovery, and strengthen governance on its path to EU accession.

However, we believe the Ukraine Facility could have a far greater impact. To this end, we urge the European Commission to consider the following recommendations:

  • Increase the quality of documents produced within the Ukraine Plan to be conducive to effective implementation and sustainable reforms.
  • Improve the visibility and transparency of the Ukraine Investment Framework for the public and civil society organisations.
  • Streamline climate and environmental objectives, including biodiversity conservation and the principle of ‘do no significant harm’, ensuring they apply to 20 per cent of total financing under the Ukraine Investment Framework and investments within the Ukraine Plan.
  • Establish a platform for civil society organisations to submit their opinions along with a procedure for transparently tracking and incorporating their opinions into official documents.
  • Ensure Ukrainian municipalities receive access to 20 per cent direct financial support from the Ukraine Plan through newly developed methodologies for submitting project concepts for public investment funding.
  • Prioritise grant support for Ukrainian civil society organisations.

We hope these recommendations will also contribute to the Commission’s annual report to the European Parliament and Council on progress towards achieving the objectives of the Ukraine Facility Regulation.

More detailed recommendations are provided in the Annex to this letter (see below).

Thank you in advance for your consideration and support.

Additional resources

Click here to download the open letter.

No to weaponised legislation in Georgia!

Written by Maxence on . Posted in Uncategorized.

The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (EaP CSF) Steering Committee calls on the Georgian authorities to cease weaponising laws to serve the interests of the ruling Georgian Dream party to the detriment Georgia’s European future.

Since the conduct of controversial parliamentary elections in Georgia (26 October 2024), the country has seen daily street demonstrations, where Georgian citizens come together against the country’s descent into authoritarianism and exercise their rights to freedom of assembly and expression through protests. These rights have been significantly and rapidly curtailed through the adoption of numerous legislative amendments by the ruling Georgian Dream party.

A lengthy list of laws has been adopted without respect for the principles of democratic lawmaking. This includes amendments in the law ‘on Assemblies and Demonstrations,’ ‘Administrative Offences Code’ and Georgia’s ‘Criminal Code’. Through these laws, the ruling party has unjustifiably restricted freedom of expression and increased criminal and administrative penalties.

It is evident that the criminalisation of peaceful forms of expression, and the imposition of disproportionately high administrative fines and prison sentences, is a result of Georgian Dream’s political ambitions to eliminate anti-government protests, rather than an objective necessity serving a legitimate goal.

For many years, Georgia’s independent civil society and media have been the main driving force for the country’s democratic transformation. However, under the Georgian Dream party’s rule, independent CSOs and media continue to be targeted by ‘weaponised legalism’.

After the adoption of the infamous law ‘on the transparency of foreign influence’, the Georgian Parliament’s Legal Issues Committee endorsed, in its first reading on March 3, a new bill on ‘Foreign Agents Registration Act’ (FARA) which intends to further broaden the scope of so-called ‘Foreign Agent Law’ and tighten its grip on Georgian civil society and media. Non-compliance with FARA will be punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Meanwhile, the parliamentary committee on sectoral economy approved in the first reading amendments to the Broadcasting Law, that would considerably tighten media regulations. The list of laws initiated by the ruling party also includes a bill that intends to restrict funding of media from foreign sources and ‘establish standards for media objectivity and journalistic ethics’, as well as ‘define institutional mechanisms for monitoring and safeguarding these standards’, all tools that could be used to silence independent media and push it to self-censorship.

Moreover, the ruling party intends to remove existing legal guarantees for CSOs’ participation in public decision-making processes, which will further undermine public consultation and meaningful participation in the lawmaking process. Georgian authorities have recently introduced a state-managed grant system for the civil sector which can be used as a tool to restrict the autonomy of civil society organisations.

The EaP CSF Steering Committee stands in solidarity with the Georgian people and civil society. We strongly condemn the use of laws to serve the political ends of the ruling Georgian Dream party, disregarding the democratic and European aspirations of the Georgian people.

We therefore call on:

The Georgian authorities

  • To end their systematic crackdown on civil society and independent media, and to cease weaponising laws to suppress dissent and political pluralism, intimidate peaceful protesters, silence independent media and civil society organisations;
  • To conduct new parliamentary elections in a free and fair manner, in order to resolve the ongoing political and constitutional crisis;
  • To immediately and unconditionally repeal all laws that unjustifiably restrict the civil and political rights of Georgian people, including recent amendments in law ‘on Assemblies and Demonstrations,’ ‘Administrative Offences Code’ and Georgia’s ‘Criminal Code’;
  • To free all the people who have been unjustly arrested during anti-government protests;
  • To uphold democratic rights and fundamental freedoms, and align its actions with the Georgian people’s aspiration for European integration.

The European Union and its Member States

  • To condemn the enactment of draconian legislation that unjustifiably restrict Georgian people’s civil and political rights;
  • To apply sanctions targeting Bidzina Ivanishvili and Georgian Dream party’s key political figures responsible for Georgia’s democratic backsliding;
  • To intensify political and financial support for Georgian civil society, media and human rights defenders;
  • To organise visits in Georgia and meet protesters and civil society representatives, showing them support for their cause and requests;
  • To continue to acknowledge and support the European aspirations of the Georgian people;
  • To invite civil society and academia instead of Georgian Dream representatives to high-level meetings ;
  • To increase pressure on the Georgian Dream party to release the people who have been arrested and continue supporting the individuals who have been charged with criminal and administrative offences.

The wider international community and donor agencies

  • To provide stronger political and direct financial support to Georgian civil society organisations and media.

The Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum