Skip to main content

Author: Irina Roman

Statement by the Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on the Parliamentary Elections in Armenia 

The Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum welcomes the successful conduct of the parliamentary elections in Armenia and congratulates the Armenian people on their democratic participation and commitment to shaping the future of their country. These elections represent an important milestone and reaffirm the country’s continued commitment to democratic governance, reform, and closer cooperation with the European Union and its Member States. 

We commend all citizens, election observers, civil society organisations, journalists, and public institutions who contributed to ensuring a transparent, competitive, and peaceful electoral process. 

These elections took place against a challenging information environment. In recent years, Russia has intensified its efforts to influence Armenia’s political and information space through disinformation campaigns and information manipulation, employing tactics similar to those previously observed in Moldova and Georgia. The experience of our region clearly demonstrates that disinformation is not a temporary phenomenon that disappears after elections. Rather, it continuously adapts its methods, narratives, and channels to exploit societal divisions and undermine democratic institutions. The fight against disinformation therefore requires sustained commitment, long-term investment, and close cooperation between governments, civil society, media organisations, and international partners. 

In this regard, we welcome the European Union’s support to Armenia in strengthening resilience against disinformation and foreign information manipulation ahead of the elections. This assistancerepresented a timely and valuable initiative that undoubtedly contributed to ensuring that Armenian citizens had greater access to reliable information and were better equipped to make informed democratic choices. Continued cooperation between Armenia and the European Union in this area will remain essential in safeguarding democratic processes and strengthening societal resilience. 

We also wish to recognise the crucial role played by civil society organisations, independent media, and democratic activists across Armenia. Members and delegates of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum worked tirelessly to raise awareness about disinformation and facilitate the exchange of expertise across borders. Through cooperation with colleagues from Moldova, Georgia, and other Eastern Partnership countries, Armenian civil society organisations have been able to learn from both successful initiatives and past challenges in countering disinformation and strengthening democratic resilience. 

Looking ahead, one of the most effective long-term responses to disinformation lies in investing in the education and empowerment of young people. The recommendations developed during the Eastern Partnership Youth Conference held on 12–13 May 2026 in Stockholm highlighted the importance of strengthening critical thinking and media literacy education in schools, including through partnerships with youth workers and civil society organisations. Participants also called for expanded opportunities for exchanges, traineeships, and civic engagement programmes focused on countering disinformation and hate speech online. Such investments are essential to ensuring that future generations are equipped to navigate an increasingly complex information environment, make informed democratic choices, and contribute to resilient and open societies across the Eastern Partnership and the EU. 

We remain committed to supporting Armenia’s democratic development, strengthening regional cooperation, and working alongside civil society partners across the Eastern Partnership and the EU to advance democratic values, resilience, peace, and prosperity throughout the region. 

Eastern Partnership Youth Conference 2026 Report

The Eastern Partnership Youth Conference, held on 12-13 May 2026 in Stockholm, Sweden brought together over 100 youth representatives, national youth councils, civil society organisations and partners from across the Eastern Partnership (EaP) region and the European Union. As a platform for dialogue, exchange and regional cooperation, the conference aimed to highlight the importance of youth civic spaces and inspire young people to become active agenda of change in their communities and beyond.

During the event, participants discussed the key challenges and opportunities shaping youth participation and civic engagement today. They also reflected on how to strengthen youth policies and participation, respond to the shrinking space for civil society in several EaP countries, and address disinformation and hate speech online affecting young people. Participants also shared good practices and explored ways to make youth engagement more inclusive, safe and meaningful.

This report presents the key discussions, reflections and recommendations emerging from the conference. It reflects the perspectives and contributions of participants and aims to support continued dialogue, cooperation, and action on strengthening youth civic spaces across the Eastern Partnership region and the EU. The full agenda of the event can be explored at the end of this report.

The conference was organised by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum and financed by the European Commission. The event was hosted by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Sweden and supported and implemented in cooperation with Fryshuset, ForumCiv, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, EU4Youth, and Olof Palme International Center. The agenda of the event was developed in cooperation with the National Youth Councils of the Eastern Partnership countries.

Discover the post event report via this link or through the display below.

Armenia Ahead of the Elections: Civil Society Insights 

As Armenia approaches its parliamentary elections on 7 June, public attention at home and abroad is high. The vote will play a significant role in shaping Armenia’s political direction, while serving as an important measure of public trust in democratic institutions, governance, and reform efforts.  

In the lead-up to the elections, this collection of publications provides valuable insights into the country’s evolving political and information environment. Readers are encouraged to explore selected English-language publications by delegates of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum in Armenia to better understand the factors shaping the electoral landscape and the role of civil society in supporting democratic processes. 

Brief: Pre-Election Disinformation and Narratives in Armenia 

Organisation: Peace Dialogue NGO 

Based on ongoing monitoring conducted by Peace Dialogue, the publication explores how disinformation and Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) are shaping public discourse through narratives linked to the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, peace negotiations, Armenia’s relations with Western actors, and perceptions of political leadership. The brief also identifies indicators of coordinated inauthentic behaviour, including networks amplifying synchronised messaging across platforms, highlighting the growing challenges these dynamics pose to democratic resilience and the integrity of Armenia’s information environment. 


Policy brief: Countering Foreign Influence Operations in Armenia․ Building Democratic Resilience ahead of the June 2026 Elections and Beyond 

Organisations: Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor (HCAV) and International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) 

The publication highlights how interference efforts, primarily driven by Russia, have evolved beyond disinformation into broader tactics such as cyberattacks, illicit political financing, economic coercion, and electoral manipulation. It argues that while immediate electoral safeguards are necessary, Armenia also needs long-term institutional reforms, stronger transparency and coordination mechanisms, and closer cooperation with civil society and international partners to address an increasingly complex and systemic challenge while safeguarding democratic freedoms. 


Article: Hybrid Intеrfеrеncе and Dеmocratic Rеsiliеncе: Armеnia’s 2026 Tеst Casе 

Organisation: Women & Global Security Architecture (WGSA) NGO 

The article examines how disinformation, hybrid influence operations, and public anxieties linked to war, displacement, and ongoing security concerns may affect the electoral environment. Drawing on Armenia’s experience and lessons from Moldova, it explores the role of information manipulation in shaping public trust and political debate, and argues that strengthening institutional credibility, electoral transparency, independent media, and rapid fact-checking mechanisms will be critical to safeguarding democratic resilience. 


Interview with Dr. Stepan Grigoryan 

Organisation: Analytical Centre on Globalization and Regional Cooperation (ACGRC) 

The interview presents an assessment of Armenia’s political trajectory ahead of the parliamentary elections, arguing that the vote will be decisive for either consolidating the country’s peace process with Azerbaijan and its European integration path or allowing domestic polarisation and external influence to disrupt it. It highlights the growing role of Russian state media and affiliated domestic actors in shaping public opinion through disinformation and fear-based narratives, particularly around border demarcation and peace negotiations, which are portrayed as “surrenders” in order to weaken public trust in the process. Despite these challenges, the outlook remains cautiously optimistic that Armenia’s peace process and EU-oriented course will continue. 

Eastern Partnership Youth Conference Speech by Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

We invite you to read the special address made by Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Leader of the Belarusian democratic forces, Head of the United Transitional Cabinet, at the opening of the 2026 Eastern Partnership Youth Conference. More about the Conference can be found here.

God morgon, kära vänner. 

Dear friends, дарагія беларускія сябры і сяброўкі, 

First of all, I want to congratulate the organizers. Scheduling a youth forum at 8 a.m. requires true bravery and great confidence in young people! 

And congratulations to all the participants who managed to make it here on time — and didn’t get lost in the narrow but beautiful streets of Stockholm. 

And yes, I heard a lot about last night’s amazing boat trip… and the even longer networking night afterward. 

This conference may be remembered for very little sleep — but hopefully for many exciting memories. 

And honestly, that is one of the best things about being young. 

The emotions you experience today, and the conversations you have at midnight over coffee or something stronger — all of this will shape your future. 

The very friendships you create one day will become your greatest professional asset. Because time flies quickly. Many of you will become ministers, ambassadors, presidents, leaders of organizations. And your WhatsApp contact list may become more valuable than your diploma. 

Of course, in politics, talent matters. Charisma matters. Ambition matters. But relationships matter even more. First you work for your reputation, and then your reputation works for you. 

Honestly, I may not be the best person to give career advice. Just six years ago, I was a housewife and a complete political beginner. Like a small kitten thrown into the waters of big politics and told: “Swim!” 

Somehow, I managed not to drown. And the only reason was because good team stood beside me. And because Belarusians supported me. 

On this political journey, I experienced many of the same things that young people entering politics experience today. 

At first, nobody takes you seriously. You patiently knock on closed doors. They seat you in the back row. You constantly have to prove your worth. You must overcome your own fear and insecurity, and push through artificial barriers. 

And I am not even talking yet about mental health. 

And it becomes even harder when you are a woman in a post-Soviet society. You need twice as much effort just to earn a place at the table — instead of being placed there “for decoration.” Usually together with youth representatives. 

But I went through it. And many of you are going through it too. 

It takes patience. Hard work. Sleepless nights. But eventually, something changes. One day you realize: people are listening to you. 

And this is why I admire Sweden so much. 

Sweden has built an open and fair society where support for young people is not charity — it is state policy. 

Meet almost any Swede under thirty in a café or a bar, and there is a good chance they belong to a student organization, youth movement, union, volunteer initiative, or political party. 

And I think many of you here will agree with me: for Belarusians, Ukrainians, Moldovans, Georgians, Armenians, Azerbaijanis — Sweden represents a model we look up to. 

Not only because of economic success. But because of strong institutions. Democratic culture. Equality. Trust. Opportunities. Respect for human dignity. 

This is also what attracts our nations toward the European Union. 

Not only prosperity — but freedom. The feeling that your voice matters. That you are respected as a citizen, not treated as a subject, or “extremist”, as we are often labeled by Lukashenka’s regime. 

In post-Soviet countries, we are still fighting the legacy of authoritarianism. We call it – “Выученная беспомощность” – learned helplessness. The belief that ordinary people cannot influence anything.  

Those of us who have studied, traveled, or lived in Europe feel this difference especially strongly. They see with their own eyes that another kind of life is possible. 

That is why mobility matters so much. Visas matter. Scholarships, exchanges matter. Open borders matter. They give young people the opportunity to bring new ideas, values, and experiences back home. 

When I was young — and definitely not yet any activist — I had such an opportunity myself when I visited Ireland through a Chernobyl exchange program. 

And honestly, I was shocked. People discussed politics. Openly criticized politicians! Very openly. And nobody disappeared afterward. 

In our post-Soviet societies, we were always taught something very different: “Don’t stand out.” That was the mantra. We heard it at home. Teachers repeated it at school, at university, we heard it even at work. 

Be like everyone else. Don’t attract attention. Keep your head down. Because if you stand out — there will be trouble. 

Today, I understand that this is exactly how dictatorship grows. 

Every regime needs obedient people. Loyal executors. Citizens who are afraid to speak. 

And this fear — the fear of being different — still lives inside many people. 

Many talented, bright, creative people never realize their potential because they stay silent, or because they simply don’t believe in themselves. 

And honestly — I was exactly the same. If not for the events of six years ago, when my husband was arrested and I entered the presidential campaign with zero political experience, you would never have seen Sviatlana Tsikhanouskayaas political leader. 

So this is my advice to you today: Stand out. Be different. Be brave. And don’t become conformists. 

Don’t accept being placed in the back row. Do not agree to become “youth representatives” only for beautiful photos and diversity reports. 

Fight for your place at the table — even when it feels uncomfortable. Even when it feels impossible. 

Ask difficult questions. Challenge old systems. Push institutions to change. 

Yesterday, during the Stockholm Conference on Belarusian Youth, organized by Swedish MFA, young Belarusians gave us, politicians, a real hard time. 

And honestly — I loved it. I heard tough criticism. And much of it was fair. 

Young people said, even in democratic forces, they are still excluded from decision-making. That there are not enough new faces. That our youth policy is weak. 

For a moment, I felt like a European bureaucrat — even though we are still only a democratic movement in exile fighting for the chance to govern our country one day. 

But the very fact that young people ask these questions makes me optimistic. 

Because it means they no longer accept symbolic participation. They demand ownership and responsibility. And this is exactly how democracy grows. 

Here, I want to acknowledge all young Belarusians in the room. Despite repression, prison, exile, and fear — you don’t give up and continue fighting.  

And I truly believe that young people will become one of the main driving forces of democratic change in Belarus. 

I admire you, just as I admire young Ukrainians who continue volunteering, creating initiatives, and defending their country despite this horrific war. 

Just as I admire young people in Moldova, Georgia, and Armenia, where youth became the driving force behind the European path. 

And just as I admire young people in Azerbaijan who, despite authoritarian pressure, continue expanding the space for freedom. 

Dear friends, 

I couldn’t agree more that we need more young people in politics. And we need a stronger youth policy across the Eastern Partnership countries. 

But we don’t need policies that only talk about young people. 

We need policies that empower them, protect them, invest in them, and include them in decision-making. 

Here, I want to thank our Swedish and EU friends in this room, who are taking a leading role in this direction. This conference is the perfect place to rethink the role of youth. 

Let’s make sure that young people are no longer sitting in the back row, but at the table — where they truly belong. 

Thank you!  

Slava Ukraini! Жыве Беларусь! 

Hybrid threats and disinformation: the role of civil society in Armenia’s elections Report

On the 21 of April 2026, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, together with The German Marshall Fund of the United States and Member of the European Parliament, Miriam Lexmann, organised the event “Hybrid Threats and Disinformation – The Role of Civil Society in Armenia’s Elections” in Brussels, Belgium.

The event brought together policymakers, experts, and civil society representatives to explore the challenges posed by hybrid threats and disinformation in Armenia ahead of the country’s national parliamentary elections on 7 June 2026. Throughout the event best practices from democratic resilience efforts were shared, and collaborative strategies to uphold electoral integrity in Armenia and the broader Eastern Partnership region were discussed.

The event will featured contributions from high-level speakers, including: 

  • Miriam Lexmann, Member of the European Parliament and Quaestor 
  • Andrey Kovatchev, Member of the European Parliament
  • Jan Latal, Strategic Communications Expert, East Stratcom Task Force, European External Action Service 
  • Lousineh Hakobyan, President, NGO Europe in Law Association; Co-Chair, EU-Armenia Civil Society Platform 
  • Daniel Ioannisyan, Director, Union of Informed Citizens
  • Dr. Dorina Baltag, Researcher, Institute for Diplomacy and International Affairs at Loughborough University London

Speakers stressed the essential role of civil society in safeguarding electoral integrity through election monitoring, debunking false narratives, explaining electoral procedures to citizens, and strengthening public resilience against disinformation. The discussion also highlighted the need to strengthen cooperation between electoral bodies, law enforcement, civil society, and international partners, while expanding digital literacy and civic education efforts, particularly in vulnerable and rural communities.

The discussion was moderated by Etienne Soula, Research Fellow, German Marshall Fund of the United States and closing remarks were delivered by Hovsep Khurshudyan, Chairman, Free Citizen NGO, Armenia; Steering Committee Member, Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum.  

Read the report

We invite you to read the post-event report by clicking this link or through the display below.

Missiles, Blackouts, and Resolve: Ukraine’s Civil Society Fights On

As spring comes around, Ukraine emerges from another bitter winter with temperatures reaching up to –25°C and Russian attacks relentlessly continuing. But the country and its people are far from being out of the woods. Just last week, the Kremlin orchestrated one of its largest missile attacks on the country within a 24-hour period since the beginning of the war, striking a UNESCO World Heritage monastery in Lviv, energy facilities, and civilian areas in multiple cities. 

Despite winter coming to an end, Ukraine’s civil society organisations (CSOs) continue to face harsh working conditions that put their lives in danger. Amidst enemy fire, civil society actors across the country have shown remarkable resilience and dedication in defending their sovereignty, democracy and European future. Amongst them are two representatives of the Ukrainian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (EaP CSF) – Igor Stukalenko, Head of Energy Programs of the Centre for Global Studies “Strategy XXI”, and Tetiana Tymoshenko, President of the Ukrainian Federation of Employers in Tourism – who share their experiences of working under these challenging conditions. 

Working amidst drone attacks, power cuts and lack of heating 

Civil society in Ukraine continues to face, first and foremost, daily physical risks to their lives. Civilian areas and infrastructure, such as office and residential buildings, are repeatedly targeted by Russia, putting staff in harm’s way. In one instance, debris from an enemy drone fell on the house of one of Tetiana’s colleagues, damaging the building and windows.  

Public transport, including stations, railway and tram tracks, and train depots, is also targeted by missile attacks, making it difficult to travel around certain cities or regions of the country. Beyond the constant threat to personal safety, these conditions result in significant time loss and ongoing logistical challenges for CSOs nationwide. 

Energy infrastructure and facilities are equally heavily targeted by Russia. Recurring drone strikes on power stations, nuclear facilities, and electricity grids result in erratic power outages of unpredictable duration. The consequences include a lack of internet connection, as well as lighting and heating in homes and workspaces alike which make for harsh, unpredictable work environments. “Due to infrastructure damage, indoor temperatures in homes and offices were 10–12°C,” explains Igor. 

Relying on remote work, emergency power generators and hope 

Despite being pushed to the brink of survival, Ukrainian civil society continues to fight for peace and provide humanitarian assistance, support displaced people, document violations of international law by the Russia, counter disinformation and uphold democratic governance.  

One way for CSOs to keep functioning is through remote work, though Tetiana mentions that this significantly reduces the quality and efficiency of their interactions and affects both their work and its outcomes.  Emergency power generators also provide quick fixes to restore power during outages. Tetiana explains that, in some cases, organisations were able to heat their premises thanks to assistance from donors and sponsors. 

Russia’s attacks on energy infrastructure are designed to deprive Ukrainians of necessities and break their spirit. We asked Igor and Tetiana what keeps their hope alive during such times. The idea that their work is essential to advancing societal values, along with the solidarity of other countries, are among the things that help them feel hopeful about the future. Being members of the EaP CSF also provides Igor’s organisation with an opportunity to promote the position of CGS “Strategy XXI” on important issues, particularly energy security. 

The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Summit’s 2025 Resolution reaffirms that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine continues to be the primary threat to Eastern Partnership countries and EU Member States. The resolution calls for the EU, its Member States, and the international community to provide sustained political, humanitarian, military, and financial support to Ukraine to achieve long-lasting peace. Igor highlights this resolution as a source of hope for the future.  

The resolution also emphasises the urgent need to begin accession negotiations for Ukraine and Moldova. It notes that “delays by certain Member States have taken hostage the opening of the ‘fundamentals’ cluster” and urges stakeholders to “find a way to overcome the current political blockage caused by a single Member State”. 

In our statement condemning the anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, we also called on the EU to urgently adopt the 20th package of sanctions against Russia, “ensuring it remains robust and comprehensive, and to refrain from any unilateral actions that would delay or dilute the EU’s unified response”. 

Going forward, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum will continue to support organisations such as those led by Tetiana and Igor, amplifying their voices and advocating for sustained, targeted support for Ukrainian civil society from the EU and its Member States. 

Event Report: The Future of Democracy Support 

The Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) of the European Parliament organised a high-level conference on “The Future of Democracy Support” on 18–19 March 2026 in Brussels. The event brought together Members of the European Parliament, representatives of the European Commission and Council Presidencies, international partners, practitioners, and experts to reflect on how the European Union can sustain and sharpen its democracy support agenda in an increasingly complex global environment. 

The DEG plays a central role in providing political guidance on election observation, supporting national parliaments beyond the EU’s borders, coordinating Sakharov Prize Community activities and facilitating mediation and dialogue initiatives. Fourteen civil society representatives from the Republic of Moldova participated in the conference as part of an advocacy mission organised by Promo-LEX Association and facilitated by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 

Over two days, discussions focused on the EU’s evolving role as a global democracy actor amid profound geopolitical shifts, including renewed great power competition, democratic backsliding and a contested multilateral order. Participants emphasised that the EU’s commitment to democracy support remains both a legal obligation and a strategic necessity. However, delivering on this commitment requires renewed political will, stronger coherence across institutions, and clearer prioritisation. Democracy promotion was consistently framed not as an optional foreign policy tool, but as a core pillar of European security and stability. 

Financing emerged as a central challenge, especially in the context of ongoing negotiations on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which will shape the EU’s external action instruments in the years ahead. While programmes such as Global Europe provide essential resources, concerns were raised about fragmentation, insufficient funding, and a lack of long-term predictability, particularly for civil society actors. Participants called for better alignment between financial tools and political priorities, stronger conditionality linked to rule of law and democratic standards and sustained investment in independent media, electoral integrity and civic space. 

The “battle of narratives” was another key theme. Participants warned that authoritarian actors are increasingly effective in shaping global discourse through disinformation, strategic communication, and coordinated influence operations. By contrast, the EU’s narrative on democracy was seen as overly defensive and less compelling internationally. A strong call emerged for a more proactive, positive, and inclusive narrative which presents democracy as a universal aspiration and connects it to citizens’ everyday concerns. Addressing perceived double standards and ensuring greater consistency in external action were also identified as essential to maintain the EU’s credibility. 

Democratic resilience in the digital age was also a major focus, particularly in enlargement and neighbourhood countries. Digital platforms were described as both a risk and an opportunity. While disinformation, foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI) and AI-generated content pose growing threats to electoral integrity and public trust, digital tools can also enhance citizen engagement and accountability. Experiences in partner countries, such as Moldova, underscored how fragile media ecosystems, foreign influence and declining funding exacerbate societal vulnerabilities. In this context, civil society organisations in Moldova play a crucial role in strengthening the country’s security and democratic resilience by addressing disinformation and FIMI through independent analysis and expertise, particularly during election periods. Their work supports public institutions, engages local communities and reinforces independent media, while also helping to communicate the tangible benefits of EU integration to citizens. 

Finally, participants stressed the need for a more structured and strategic approach to bringing together democracy supporters across institutions and regions. This includes enhancing coordination among EU institutions, Member States and international partners, and mainstreaming democracy support across all policy areas.  

EaP CSF Regranting to Members Lot 2 – addressing Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum’s advocacy priorities – selected projects for 2026

1. Empowering EaP National Youth Councils for Regional Impact  

Lead applicant: Armenian Progressive Youth, Armenia.  

Co-applicants: National Youth Council of Moldova; Belarusian National Youth Council, RADA; National Youth Council of Ukraine. Implementation period is 8 months.  

This project aims to strengthen the institutional role of National Youth Councils (NYCs) in the Eastern Partnership region by enhancing their organisational resilience, strategic positioning, and capacity to access and manage resources. NYCs play a vital role in policy dialogue and youth advocacy, yet they often face significant challenges, including limited institutional capacity, restrictive political environments, and weak financial sustainability.  

2. Bridging the Gap: Advancing Child-Friendly Justice in EaP Countries 

Lead applicant: Alliance of NGOs active in the field of Child and Family Protection, Moldova.  

Co-applicants: Partnership for Every Child, Ukraine; “Armenian Constitutional Right-Protective Centre” NGO, Armenia; Armenia Journalists’ Club “Asparez” NGO, Armenia; Center for the Study of Democracy, Bulgaria. Implementation period is 6 months. 

The project aims to promote stronger prevention services and alternatives to detention through evidence-based advocacy by APSCF with partners from Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, and Bulgaria. The project combines a regional mapping of effective legal and community-based practices with peer learning, including a study visit and expert-led training on European models of diversion (actions that could divert children away from detention), rehabilitation, and restorative justice. The project will result in a joint position paper translating evidence into clear policy recommendations to expand and improve alternatives to detention.  

3. Advocacy for CSOs in times of uncertainty 

Lead applicant: Center for Policies and Reforms, Moldova. Co-applicants: “NGO Center”, Armenia; Reanimation Package of Reforms Coalition, Ukraine. Implementation period is 5 months.  

The project aims to support civic engagement in the Eastern Partnership – particularly in Moldova, Armenia, and Ukraine – by strengthening the capacities of civil society organisations to engage in policy dialogue, advocacy, resilience-building, and public participation. It will also promote collaboration and peer learning among CSOs through a series of participatory online trainings and a spring school on advocacy in times of uncertainty.   

4. Pathways to Justice: A regional dialogue on judicial reforms: Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, conference

Lead applicant: Protection of Rights without Borders, Armenia.  

Co-applicant: Legal Resources Center, Moldova. Implementation period is 2 months.  

The project will examine judicial reform practices in Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova, assessing key achievements, shortcomings, and the factors driving them. By analysing each country’s reform approach – covering both legal changes and institutional implementation – the project will identify common challenges, successful strategies, and remaining gaps. The work will culminate in a dedicated conference, followed by a targeted advocacy campaign. 

EaP Senior Officials’ Meeting, 19 March 2026

The Chair of the Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, Mr. Lasha Tughushi, held a speech at the Senior Officials’ Meeting, the executive meeting bringing together the European Commission, EEAS, and high-level civil servants from the EU Member States and the EaP countries.

Speech by Mr. Lasha Tughushi, Chair of the EaP CSF Steering Committee

“Dear representatives of European Institutions and Member States,

Dear Eastern Partners, 

Dear colleagues, 

I am honoured to speak to you today on behalf of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 

Over the past years, the Eastern Partnership has provided structured channels for civil society to participate in policymaking, regional networks, and dialogue with the European Union.  

This encouraged cross-border cooperation and helped reinforce democratic resilience across the region.  

Despite geopolitical shifts, internal political crises, and ongoing conflicts – regional trends indicate that EaP civil society remains crucial for democratic development, the rule of law, and European integration.  

Yet – authoritarian pressures, shrinking resources, limited institutionalised participation, and disinformation campaigns are undermining civil society’s operations.  

EU enlargement remains an existential goal for the EaP countries. 

And EU accession a security guarantee for Ukraine. 

The strength of Ukrainian civil society is the foundation of Ukraine’s resilience in the face of the ongoing Russia’s war of aggression.  

Amid war, Ukrainian civil society continues to push for reforms engaging in defence, governance, and recovery efforts.  

The war has significantly strained human resources in the civic sector, yet civil society remains remarkably active.  

However, there is a trend towards narrowing civic space in terms of access to information and participation in decision-making.  

In the Republic of Moldova, civil society is a key partner and supporter of EU integration and policy reform.  

At the same time, it still faces threats from pro-Russian politicians through smear campaigns and legal harassment. 

We believe that the accession process to the European Union for Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova should be accelerated. 

Over the last years, in Armenia, civil society gained strong public support. 

There, civil society actively monitors government policies and contributes to key reforms on anti-corruption and the judiciary.  

However – looking at June’s parliamentary elections – its watchdog functions are weakened by limited resources, in a context where disinformation and hybrid threats from abroad are intensifying.  

In this regard, Armenian civil societies are being actively supported by their Moldovan colleagues through capacity building in order to counter anti-EU narrative spread during elections, and provide correct and comprehensive information to the public. 

There is a new kind of momentum in the country. Civil society and pro-European political forces are joining efforts to shape the country’s political agenda. 

The law launching Armenia’s accession process to the EU was submitted through the efforts of the “Eurovote” civic initiative, whose founding members are primarily representatives of the Armenian National Platform of the Civil Society Forum. 

Armenia’s accelerated EU integration efforts are an inspiration for its neighbors. 

In Georgia, my home country, civil society, activists, and democratic forces continue a sustained, daily fight to maintain democratic freedoms, despite escalating repression – including the recent package of laws tightening control over foreign funding for NGOs and media.  

EU flexible funding instruments are needed to continue support Georgian civil society – including for organisations forced to flee the country due to criminal persecution.  

Support for Georgian civil society in this challenging context constitutes a strong impetus for the country’s return to the European family. 

In Azerbaijan, civil society continues to face restrictions on operations, foreign funding and registration of grants.  

Independent media are under high pressure.  

Activists face arrests and harassment, while human rights activists living in exile are also faced with acts of intimidation.  

The establishment of mechanisms and coordinated fora for international donors and NGOs should be promoted to coordinate strategies for supporting civil society and media. 

The Forum will continue to channel the voice of Belarusian civil society.  

Systematic dismantling of organisations and forced exile of activists continue, while grassroots movements inside the country remain largely invisible.  

Under these circumstances, continuing to support civil society operating from abroad remains vital. 

In this diversified environment, the Eastern Partnership policy can be leveraged to: 

  1. Maintain connections between civil society actors;  
  1. Strengthen resilience against hybrid threats, disinformation and external interferences – through capacity building and technical assistance; 
  1. Facilitate dialogue via regular fora; and  
  1. Coordinate targeted support through: 
  • flexible and innovative instruments for civil society operating in restrictive environment; and  
  • civil society intermediaries from other EaP countries. 

Speaking about the EaP Multi-Annual Workplan, we are glad to see that interaction with the EU Member States is reflected in the planned regional events for 2026.  

A strong focus on digital transformation and transition, and connectivity, results evident from the calendar, in line with the strategic approach to the Black Sea.  

Existing partnerships in trade, energy, transport and digital sectors in the South Caucasus will be instrumental in unlocking investment opportunities within the Black Sea.  

At the same time, civil society’s oversight will be essential to ensure that these will be to the benefit of the communities.  

To this end, civil society should be able to take part in structured consultation mechanisms with local actors.  

The working group for gender equality remains an important forum where civil society experts – including Belarusian civil society – share recommendations on gender-based violence and women’s access to justice andbring success stories from the countries. 

The Civil Society Forum will continue to engage with relevant actors to work on its flagship projects. I will conclude by mentioning two of them.  

  1. In May, in Stockholm, 100 youth representatives will gather in the EaP Youth Conference to discuss the importance of youth civic spaces in the Eastern Partnership. Youth civic spaces enable young people to participate in public life and engage in reform process. In a context where key electoral campaigns were marked by active online disinformation, young people assess the information they encounter online, identify sources they can trust, and make well-informed decisions.
  1. And second: after 8 years, the Civil Society Summit is back in an EaP country. In November, Chisinau will host the largest gathering of civil society representatives from the EaP and the EU, who will discuss the most pressing questions regarding the region, countries and policy.  

I will stop here. Thank you for your attention. I wish you a productive continuation of the meeting.”

How Art and Culture are Helping Sustain Civic Space in Belarus

The interview was conducted with Nadzeya Haretskaya, ArtPower Belarus representative, Deputy Director of Belarusian Council for Culture.

ArtPower Belarus is an EU-funded cultural support programme implemented by the Danish Cultural Institute in partnership with the Belarusian Council for Culture. Its core mission is to safeguard Belarusian civic space through culture and the arts.

They support independent Belarusian cultural and artistic initiatives by strengthening their role and capacities as democratic change-makers. In practice, this means supporting projects that enhance the quality and visibility of Belarusian culture, connecting creators and audiences on both sides of the border, developing professional networks, improving working conditions for cultural actors, and supporting their integration into the European cultural space.

This program was created thanks to ongoing advocacy by its partners, who highlighted the importance of culture in supporting democratic change within EU policies and cooperation. Because of this, culture is now seen as a key priority for support.

How can art and culture keep civic space alive and open up more public dialogue in Belarus?

Nadzeya Haretskaya: “In the Belarusian context, culture is not only about heritage preservation or artistic expression. It is also one of the few spaces where society can continue to reflect, connect, and imagine itself beyond authoritarian control.

Art and culture help sustain civic space because they preserve language, memory, values, and the ability to speak to one another across borders, generations, and experiences. They create common ground for public dialogue not only among Belarusians in exile, but also between people inside the country and those outside it. In a fragmented and repressed environment, culture often remains the most accessible platform for trust-building and for maintaining a sense of shared belonging.

At the same time, the situation in Belarus makes it clear that authoritarian regimes not only understand the power of culture — they fear it.”

Artists, cultural institutions, memory work, and independent media are among the first targets of repression precisely because culture shapes identity, resilience, and democratic imagination. In this sense, supporting culture means supporting civic resilience, public dialogue, and, ultimately, the foundations of a democratic future.

Looking back at the first edition of the program, are there any projects or collaborations that particularly stood out to you? What made them memorable?

Nadzeya Haretskaya: “Looking back at the first edition of ArtPower Belarus, we could highlight several different layers of impact. Some of the most important initiatives we supported were those implemented inside Belarus or involving participants based in Belarus. For obvious security reasons, many of them could not be made public, but for us they were extremely important because they demonstrated that cultural life inside the country continues despite repression and isolation. It is also important to note that scale and visibility did not always go hand in hand: some of the smallest projects were fully public, while some of the largest initiatives could not be disclosed at all.

There were highly visible public projects that reached broad audiences and showed the scale and diversity of independent Belarusian culture from opera, theatre, film, music, and visual art to media, publishing, and education.

These projects were memorable because they did not simply produce cultural content; they created spaces for meeting, reflection, solidarity, and visibility.

One of the most strategically important outcomes was the emergence and strengthening of professional associations, networks, and sector-based communities. We see this as long-term infrastructure work: not only supporting individual creators, but also helping cultural actors organise, cooperate, and represent themselves more effectively.

More broadly, the first edition of the programme supported 140 projects and mobility opportunities, including 83 creative projects and 57 mobility grants. It also helped launch an art management school, two major studies of the cultural sector, a series of analytical reviews, and the ongoing work of the Resource Center and Guest Space. This combination of direct project support, mobility, research, and ecosystem-building is what made the first edition particularly meaningful. 79 more projects have already been supported within the current edition of the ArtPower Belarus programme.”

What kind of impact does this type of cultural funding have both for the individual artists involved and for the wider Belarusian cultural ecosystem?

Nadzeya Haretskaya: “For individual artists and cultural actors, this kind of funding provides much more than short-term financial support. It creates opportunities to continue working professionally, to experiment, to travel, to present work internationally, to build partnerships, and to remain visible in a situation where many have lost institutions, infrastructure, and access to audiences. For many participants, ArtPower Belarus was also a way to regain a sense of continuity, dignity, and connection with a wider professional community.

For the broader ecosystem, the impact is structural. Cultural funding helps maintain and rebuild networks, institutions, and professional standards. It enables collaborations across countries and sectors, connects Belarusian creators with European partners, and strengthens the long-term infrastructure needed for independent cultural life to survive and develop.

It is also important to underline that we do not see this support as limited to projects in exile. One of its major values is that it helps maintain links between Belarusians inside the country and outside it between creators, communities, and audiences on both sides of the border. In this sense, cultural funding does not only support artistic production; it helps preserve the continuity of Belarusian civic and cultural space itself.

At the same time, demand still far exceeds available resources. We would like to especially acknowledge and thank the European Union for its consistent support of Belarusian culture and civil society. This trust and partnership have made it possible not only to implement the first edition of the programme, but also to continue and expand this work in its next phase. Belarusian culture is not a peripheral issue, it is part of Europe’s democratic resilience and an important element of the country’s future.“